Today, EASA issued an updated agenda for the 2013 EASA / FAA International Aviation Safety Conference. The Conference is the annual meeting among EASA, FAA, TCCA and other regulators to discuss new paradigms in regulatory oversight. This meeting directly impacts the aviation industry, which is the subject of this regulatory oversight!
The updated agenda provides better guidance on what to expect from the 2013 meeting.
Sessions that will be interesting to member of the PMA manufacturing community will include:
MARPA will be there and will be reporting on the new directions proposed by the regulators.
We have written recently on this blog about the important SMS/Part 21 Aviation Rulemaking Committee (ARC) and corresponding Working Groups in which representatives of MARPA are now participating. The result of this ARC promises to affect each and every manufacturer of PMA in some way or another. MARPA will therefore be there every step of the way, working to ensure that the interests of PMA community are protected. But in order to ensure that we guard our members’ interests, we will need your assistance and feedback! We are therefore asking MARPA members to tracks and share with us the cost of regulatory compliance.
The Regulatory Flexibility Act requires agencies to attempt to fit the burdens of a proposed regulation to the scale of businesses. This recognizes the fact that the same regulatory burden that may simply be the cost of doing business to a large multinational corporation may be crippling to a small company. Recognizing the extreme importance of scalability in the promulgation of the new Part 21, one of the four Working Groups is dedicated solely to undertaking a Cost-Benefit Analysis of the proposed regulatory changes.
This is where MARPA member feedback will be of extreme importance. The Cost-Benefit Analysis Working Group needs data to better understand what the current cost of compliance to small business actually is. This will function as a baseline from which to determine the benefits and costs of the proposals generated by the other three Working Groups. As the Working Groups craft the new regulations they will turn to industry to obtain data demonstrating the effects of the proposed changes.
It is vital that MARPA members participate in providing data to the Working Groups as the new proposals are developed and those assumptions tested against hard data. Hidden costs of compliance with regulations, under-estimations of costs, and over-estimations of benefits have the potential to result in an overly burdensome regulation. The participation of MARPA members in providing data to the ARC Working Groups will go a long way toward shaping an effective regulation while minimizing the burden on small businesses.
Input from members helps MARPA to more effectively advocate for policy changes that benefit the PMA community. Responses to requests for information such as this—or for data regarding the Streamlined PMA Process—helps MARPA to focus its resources to optimize benefit to the membership.
MARPA looks forward to the participation of its members in shaping the future of Part 21. Although the Working Groups have not yet begun to approach industry with requests for data, MARPA would like to get started early. If your company tracks the cost of regulatory compliance, whether in dollars, personnel, man-hours, paperwork, or any other metric, we want to hear from you. Your confidentiality is important to us, so MARPA will only report data in the aggregate; no individual data will be released and no company names will be revealed. You can send this data to MARPA Associate Counsel Ryan Aggergaard at email@example.com. Please also send Ryan an email if you have any questions or would like to start tracking compliance costs.
The SMS/Part 21 Aviation Rulemaking Committee (ARC) opened a three day meeting this morning in Rosslyn, Virginia. The meeting expands the scope of the ARC to include four working groups that will develop the new rules for certification and approval of aviation products and articles. MARPA staff attended the live meeting and MARPA members participated by dial-in teleconference. This project will definitely affect every MARPA member and could be the most important rulemaking activity affecting the PMA community in over 60 years!
Dorenda Baker is the Director of the FAA Aircraft Certification Service. Ultimately, the ARC reports to her. Baker explained that the FAA is committed to taking the ARC’s recommendations and moving forward with those recommendations to craft a rule that meets our ICAO SARP obligations (SMS or Safety Management Systems). She stressed that we need to take into consideration how this rule will apply to both large and small companies. It needs to achieve safety goals for everyone.
Some of the points that Baker raised included these:
MARPA has been centrally involved in drafting the working group charters in order to ensure that the ARC recommendations will support the next generation of safety management. Baker’s commitment to protecting the interest of both small companies and large companies is encouraging; but the details will be important to the PMA community and there is plenty of opportunity to see a rule that does not work well. With this in mind, this could be one of the most important projects that MARPA has ever worked-on for the future of the PMA community. MARPA will remain at the heart of this process in order to ensure that the interests of the PMA community are protected.
Have you ever wanted to influence the regulations that affect your business? Well, NOW is your best opportunity to do so!
In January, we provided early notice to the PMA community that the FAA would be seeking industry experts to volunteer for working groups that will be rewriting the manufacturing regulations. Now, we are collecting names and submitting them! This is a tremendous opportunity to make sure that the regulations reflect the current state of the art for certification and approval processes.
The Part 21/SMS Aviation Rulemaking Committee (ARC) is undertaking a major project to review Part 21 and (1) to make it consistent with ICAO Standards for Safety Management Systems, (2) add regulations to create a design organization and (3) update the regulation as necessary.
The Part 21/SMS ARC has recently completed charters for four (4) working groups that will be helping to craft the Part 21 language as well as developing a new paradigm for FAA oversight of systems. These worknig groups will report to the ARC, and will be where the real ground work occurs in changing the manufacturing regulations. We are seeking MARPA members who would like to volunteer to be on these committees. The first working group meetings will likely be April 3-5 and working group members will need to support the working group efforts through 2013 (final Reports are due December 10, 2013).
The four working groups are:
(1) Design Organization: This working group will develop regulations for design organizations, similar to the DOA regulation in Europe. Design organizations will have more safety responsibility and accountability, and in turn would receive greater privileges. The goal of this group will be to help the FAA create design organizations that can serve as the backbone for safety management.
(2) Safety Management Systems (SMS): This working group will help to integrate requirements for safety management systems in to the FAA manufacturing regulations. The goal of this group will be to better align the FAA’s regulations with the requirements of SMS.
(3) Oversight: This working group will develop a new model for FAA oversight that will better reflect risk management in an era with shrinking government budgets and expanding industry need for government approval and/or certification. The goal of this group will be to help the FAA create a program to ensure a consistently high level of safety with a dwindling resource pool.
(4) Cost-Benefit Analysis (CBA): This working group will examine the work of the first three working groups and will help develop the data and other tools that the FAA will need to perform a cost-benefit analysis. The work of this group will be critically important to ensuring that the product from the entire ARC makes good safety sense and good economic sense.
This effort could reflect the most significant change in the U.S. aviation manufacturing regulations in over 50 years. The results of this effort will touch all of us. If you think you would like to serve on one of these working groups then please contact us immediately so we can send you more information. We need to submit our recommendations to the ARC by the end of next week, so we need to hear from you by not later than Thursday, March 7.
Don’t forget that the 2013 MARPA Winter Meeting will be held in Washington, DC on February 12, 2013.
Expected speakers include:
Our topics for discussion will likely include PMA developments, streamlined PMA for non-safety-sensitive (NSS) parts, Instructions for continued airworthiness, air carrier needs, and tax laws and regulations with a particular affect on PMA parts manufacturers. In addition to our speakers, we will be discussing our government affairs program and strategic planning for the Association.
The Winter meeting is an intimate opportunity to work closely with the Association and the Board on topics of special interest to MARPA members.
If you would like to attend the meeting, please RSVP to MARPA at (202) 628-6777. There is no charge for registering for this meeting; and the meeting is open to all MARPA members.
The FAA is working to incorporate Safety Management Systems (SMS) elements into the existing Part 21 regulations for design and production. As part of this endeavor, they have asked MARPA to assist them in an Aviation Rulemaking Committee (ARC).
MARPA has long been involved in SMS, having taken steps to educate the membership about the elements of SMS as well as been involved in drafting proposed regulations to implement SMS for FAA certificate holders, generally.
This new ARC represents an opportunity to ensure that the Part 21 regulations better reflect the safety needs of the industry and the public. It is a potential opportunity to remove regulations that no longer add value and to add regulations that would better ensure safety.
Following is a list of questions that we’ve developed that will help us to identify potential changes to Part 21 that might be made in the context of implementing SMS in the Part. We would appreciate your answers to any or all of them. While we cannot promise than any particular proposal will be implemented into the regulations, your thoughtful answer will help guide our participation on the ARC and will help us develop constructive recommendations to advance the regulatory revision process. Where it is relevant, separating or distinguishing your answers with respect to the design, production, or other elements of the Part 21 regulations would be helpful.
Question One: What does the FAA do that you think is not necessary to safety?
Question Two: What does the FAA require you to do that you think is not necessary to safety?
Question Three: What additional activities do you think regulated aviation businesses should accomplish to better support safety?
Question Four: What additional support or information could the FAA provide that would better support safety?
Question Five: What information do you submit to the FAA that you think is not necessary to safety?
Question Six: What additional information could you submit to the FAA that you think would help promote safety?
At the 2012 MARPA Annual Conference, Attorney Tom Dunlap offered some advice to the conference attendees about tactics for avoiding liability when faced with a law suit.
He explained that law suits are inevitable when you are business, but liability is not inevitable in a law suit.
Mr. Dunlap gave a brief overview of the legal concepts involved in a lawsuit after an accident or incident, and also explained that although 75% of accidents are ultimately traced to pilot error, manufacturers are seen as having “deep pockets” and so will almost always be a target for plaintiffs in a law suit.
Mr. Dunlap also dispelled certain misconceptions, such as the myth that an FAA Certificate precludes liability. He also offered operational and legal suggestions to help businesses mitigate potential liability.
MARPA’s President is a lawyer (that is, *I* am a lawyer), and MARPA firmly believes that effective prevention is worth the investment. This is one of the reasons why hazard identification and risk mitigation in a Safety Management System can be an effective safety tool. Dunlaps’s comments provided a great guide for MARPA members seeking some advice on where to start in mitigating liabilities.
MARPA is currently in discussion with Dunlap to secure more useful advice for the members!
If you missed the 2012 MARPA Annual Conference, then you can still track MARPA’s developments and the industry and regulatory changes that affect the PMA industry by joining MARPA.
Looking for the schedule for the MARPA Conference on Thursday? Here it is!
|OCTOBER 4, 2012 – DAY ONE GENERAL SESSION|
|7:00am – 5:00pm||Registration in the main lobby|
|8:30am – 10:00am|
|Mike Arata, Managing Director-Project Engineering and Technical Operations, United Airlines Day One Keynote Speaker|
|Jason Dickstein, MARPA President MARPA’s 2012 Accomplishments, and What They Will Mean for YOUR 2013|
|10:30am – 12:00noon|
|Carol Giles, President, Carol E. Giles & Associates, Inc. Regulatory Challenges and FAA Compliance IssuesGiles recently retired as the Manager of Aircraft Maintenance for the Federal Aviation Administration. She has been involved in the regulations and policies that affect the use of PMA parts, and will share her experience with PMAs and discuss some recent FAA guidance that affects PMAs, including ICA guidance that helps to protect PMA parts from anticompetitive ICA licensing agreements (those anti-competitive agreements tended to undermine safety). She will share her thoughts on strategies for PMA success under a compliance paradigm.|
|Ed Bayne, Enterprise & Industry Interface, Boeing (on behalf of IAQG) International Aviation Quality Group Update, including the AS9100 series of standards|
|Tom Cooper, Sr VP and Principal, Team SAI, Inc. PMA Industry Economic Outlook|
|12:00noon – 1:30pm||LUNCH SPONSORED BY ABLE AEROSPACE|
|1:30pm – 3:00pm|
|Thomas Dunlap, Partner, Dunlap Grubb and Weaver Manufacturing Liability and Strategies for Avoiding LitigationStrategies for protecting your business from unwarranted product liability claims.|
|Fred Elliot, US Department of Commerce Exports and the PMA MarketElliott describes the tools and programs available from the Commerce Department that can help PMA manufacturers identify non-US customers, and can facilitate export of parts to more customer.|
|David Daniels, Vice President North America, Wencor Group PMA and Legacy Programs|
|3:00pm – 3:30pm||BREAK SPONSORED BY AERO-INSTRUMENTS|
|3:30pm – 5:00pm|
|John Milewski, PMA Program Manager, Federal Aviation Administration Quality Systems Development for PMA Manufacturers: Next Step|
|Tom Enyart, Manager Propulsion Branch, LAACO, Federal Aviation Administration [due to FAA travel policies, we expect Mr. Enyart to join us by video conference] The Continued Operational Safety Plan: Are You Ready?|
|Walter Desrosier, Vice President of Engineering and Maintenance, General Aviation Manufacturers Association Safety Management Systems and PMADesrosier is an instrumental part of the aviation rulemaking community. He has served as the chair of the manufacturing team in the FAA Aviation Rulemaking Committee on SMS and we continue to partner with him to develop SMS proposals tat will work for the manufacturing community. Desrosier will provide an update on where the current SMS plans are taking us.|
Need to meet with air carriers about your PMA parts? They will be at the 2012 MARPA Conference, and they will be looking for PMA solutions.
MARPA has 40 pre-registered air carrier representatives from 17 different air carriers attending the 2012 Annual Conference in Las Vegas:
For a complete look at the pre-registered attendees for the Conference, please be sure to check out our pre-registration list, which was published on September 22. This list is not complete, as we always have had a significant numbers of attendees who register in the lat week or at the door; but it does provide a reasonable look at the businesses that have already made a commitment to attend.
Good news! In response to the MARPA petition, the FAA plans to withdraw the vibration rule, in tomorrow’s Federal Register.
You can see an advance preview of the expected Federal Register notice online. The advance preview explains that MARPA’s request was the motivator for the withdrawal.
MARPA had also filed a suit with the US Court of Appeals, asking the Court to strike the rule change down on the grounds that it was illegally promulgated. The rule change had been issued as a direct final rule with no opportunity for public comment, in contravention to both FAA regulations and the Administrative Procedures Act.
In addition, there were substantive problems with the rule, in that it imposed new burdens on PMA applicants without any correlative safety benefits. The result of such new burdens could have been to stifle development of reliability and safety improvements in the industry.
When the withdrawal of the rule change is formally published in the Federal Register, tomorrow, MARPA intends to withdraw the petition for review from the Court of Appeals, on the grounds that it will be moot (we will have already gotten everything we wanted).
This is great news for the industry, as it removes an amendment to the regulations that appeared to undermine safety, rather than improving it.
It is likely that the vibration rule change may be reissued as a notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM). If this happens, then it will be important for industry to respond to make sure thtat the final rule is crafted in a way that supports our shared safety goals, rather than conflicting with them.