you're reading...
Aircraft Parts, aviation, FAA, FAA Design Approval, Manufacturing, PMA, Regulatory

FAA Commits to a Regulatory Balance

At the 30th International Aviation Safety Conference, the regulators of the world discussed the balance between harmonized (global) standards and regional flexibility (lack of harmonization that permits national flexibility).

FAA Aircraft Certification Director Dorenda Baker explained that the optimal regulatory structure balances the rigor applied during a certification exercise.  The reason for this is that as rigor increases, cost of certification increases.  She explained that as cost of certification increases, safety can decrease to the extent that certification costs have a chilliing effect on safety innovations.

One example of putting this theory into effect can be found in the way that FAA approves avionics software 

FAA created a system that divided software into four tiered classes for certification purposes.  Baker feels that there is a relation between the avionics that we’re permitted to be certified and the reduction of CFIT (controlled flight into terrain).

Baker explained that “Sometimes you’ve got to get out of the way, for safety.”

With this in mind, the FAA is working on ways to ensure that the airwortness standards reflect performance standards. A part of this effort is removing methods of compliance from the regulations, in order to ensure that the regulations do not limit innovation. Methods of compliance should more properly be published in guidance.


About Jason Dickstein

Mr. Dickstein is the President of the Washington Aviation Group, a Washington, DC-based aviation law firm. He represents several aviation trade associations, including the Aviation Suppliers Association, the Aircraft Electronics Association, the Air Carrier Purchasing Conference, and the Modification and Replacement Parts Association. He also represents private clients drawn from the spectrum of the aviation industry.


One thought on “FAA Commits to a Regulatory Balance

  1. Jason: OUTSTANDING and timely article. Thanks for sharing. Everyone senior manager in the FAA I know understands the simple fact that the more government help one receives the less money and brain power there is to apply to real safety concerns that ONLY the company understands. We can lose site of the forest for the trees I believe is the appropriate statement here. Another great example of how senior management within the Agency is trying to help themselves as well as industry and therefore improve safety is the 21 ARC.

    Posted by Dennis Piotrowski | June 19, 2013, 10:18 am

Leave a Reply

Please log in using one of these methods to post your comment: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: